“A picture is worth a thousand words.”
Similarly, a good figure or graph displays interesting data or relationships therein in a way that is informative, accessible, non-redundant, possibly thought-provoking, and visually pleasing. There is any number of ways to render a graph or figure ineffective, for example, through a lack of labels or annotations, stacking information that should not be stacked (e.g., stacked line or bar charts), ambiguous or obscure variables (e.g., a ratio of two variables that obscures whether differences among observations stem from differences in the nominator, denominator, or both), redundancy with the accompanying text or a table (e.g., a pie chart that adds nothing to what is already in the text or a table), or visual clutter.
To obtain a visually pleasing figure one should aim for a minimalist quality. The data and its scaffolding (e.g., the grid) should be displayed with as little ink as possible without impairing the information content and its accessibility. More detailed advice and many examples can be found in Tufte’s (2001) The visual display of quantitative information.
One figure of my own making that I consider successful in these respects is an enhanced version of a figure published in Malter (2014) On the causality and cause of returns to organizational status: evidence from the grands crus classés of the Médoc, Administrative Science Quarterly. The figure below, handcoded in R, integrates and enhances figure 1 and table 1 as they appear in the article.